On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 06:42:53PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/07/2023 12:27, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> > Add sam9x7 bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/atmel-usb.txt | 11 +++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/atmel-usb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/atmel-usb.txt
> > index 12183ef47ee4..82bd0dbc2a48 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/atmel-usb.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/atmel-usb.txt
> > @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ Atmel SOC USB controllers
> > OHCI
> >
> > Required properties:
> > - - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91rm9200-ohci" for USB controllers
> > - used in host mode.
> > + - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91rm9200-ohci" or
> > + "microchip,sam9x7-ohci", "atmel,at91rm9200-ohci"
> > + for USB controllers used in host mode.
> > - reg: Address and length of the register set for the device
> > - interrupts: Should contain ohci interrupt
> > - clocks: Should reference the peripheral, host and system clocks
> > @@ -30,8 +31,9 @@ usb0: ohci@500000 {
> > EHCI
> >
> > Required properties:
> > - - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91sam9g45-ehci" for USB controllers
> > - used in host mode.
> > + - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91sam9g45-ehci" or
> > + "microchip,sam9x7-ehci", "atmel,at91sam9g45-ehci"
>
> This confuses me. Isn't microchip,sam9x7-ehci already described in EHCI
> bindings?
The Atmel .dts (including the one in this series) files use usb-ohci and
usb-ehci compatibles, but they have extra properties (and clocks are
different IIRC). So they aren't 'generic' and should drop those
compatibles. There's already warnings generated for this, but obviously
no one is paying attention.
Rob
