Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add Intel SoCFPGA USB controller bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/07/2023 08:35, Ng, Adrian Ho Yin wrote:
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/intel,socfpga-dwc3.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/intel,socfpga-dwc3.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..dedef70df887
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/intel,socfpga-dwc3.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/intel,socfpga-dwc3.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Intel SoCFPGA DWC3 USB controller
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Adrian Ng Ho Yin <adrian.ho.yin.ng@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: intel,agilex5-dwc3
>>
>> Why using compatible style different than other Agilex blocks? Which 
>> one is recommended/official/correct?
> 
> This style is used so that future SoCFPGA products can reuse the same binding. 

Wait, why? How future products are relevant to style of compatible for
existing device? Again - why using different style? Which one is correct?


Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux