> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 4:59 PM > To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx; hminas@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: usb: dwc2: add compatible "intel,socfpga- > stratix10-hsotg" > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. > > On 19/07/2023 10:45, Li, Meng wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 2:39 PM > >> To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > >> robh+conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > >> dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx; hminas@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: usb: dwc2: add compatible > >> "intel,socfpga- stratix10-hsotg" > >> > >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the > >> sender and know the content is safe. > >> > >> On 19/07/2023 04:55, Meng Li wrote: > >>> Add the compatible "intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg" to the DWC2 > >>> implementation, because the Stratix DWC2 implementation does not > >>> support clock gating. This compatible is used with generic snps,dwc2. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <Meng.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Missing changelog, missing versioning. This is v3 or v4. > >> > >>> --- > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml | 1 + > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml > >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml > >>> index dc4988c0009c..f90094320914 100644 > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml > >>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ properties: > >>> - amlogic,meson-g12a-usb > >>> - amlogic,meson-a1-usb > >>> - intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg > >>> + - intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg > >> > >> So you just sent the same patch as before. I pointed you to the > >> proper solution with compatibility. > >> > > > > No. not the same. > > I don't understand why SoC specific compatible "intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg" is > able to be added, but the SoC specific compatible "intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg" > is not allowed. > > > > You said "Where is SoC specific compatible?" > > Now, I add the SoC specific compatible "intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg", but > why it is still not reasonable. > > The compatible should be added, but I said they are compatible, so express it. I > also gave you example of file which expresses it. > > Why that compatible is not allowed alone? Because what we said here many, > many times and because the doc I gave you which explains this. > I had a look the doc ,and refer to rk3128.dtsi and commit 5032b269203287c17064d33c72be1ebf30c04a95. So I think it needs to add " intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg" Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml. But if you think it is not reasonable, could you please show what is your modification for the dwc2.yaml. Thanks, Limeng > Best regards, > Krzysztof
