Re: question on uapi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 03:49:32PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> 
> On 13.07.23 15:22, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 12:39:09PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > what is the policy on uapi. It being for user space means
> > > that it should be as complete as possible, even if the kernel does not need stuff,
> > > should it not?
> > 
> > If the kernel does not need it, why add it to a uapi .h file as there is
> > nothing that userspace could do with it, right?
> > 
> > Or are you talking about USB protocols/structures that userspace can use
> > by talking to a USB device directly?
> > 
> > Specifics would be great to have, thanks.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I wanted to get this clarified in principle.

There's no principle, only specifics :)

> In this particular case I found that we are lacking definitions
> in uapi for authentication descriptors. User space can definitely
> see them.

Then we should add them where needed.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux