On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 06:36:32 +0200 Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > To chime in here: I most agree, but FWIW, it broke more than a decade > ago in v3.0, so maybe this is better suited for net-next. But of course > that up to the -net maintainers. I'm surprised to see you suggest -next for a fix to a user reported bug. IMO it's very firmly net material.