On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:57:39AM +0800, Guiting Shen wrote: > The ohci_hcd_at91_drv_suspend() sets ohci->rh_state to OHCI_RH_HALTED when > suspend which will let the ohci_irq() skip the interrupt after resume. And > nobody to handle this interrupt. > > Set the ohci->rh_state to OHCI_RH_SUSPEND instead of OHCI_RH_HALTED when > suspend to fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Guiting Shen <aarongt.shen@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c > index b9ce8d80f20b..7a970e573668 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c > @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ ohci_hcd_at91_drv_suspend(struct device *dev) > * REVISIT: some boards will be able to turn VBUS off... > */ > if (!ohci_at91->wakeup) { > - ohci->rh_state = OHCI_RH_HALTED; > + ohci->rh_state = OHCI_RH_SUSPENDED; It looks like this change ignores the comment immediately above it (just before the start of this hunk). If you want to find a way to handle IRQs better after the controller resumes, maybe you should change the resume routine instead of the suspend routine. Alan Stern