On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:06:15PM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/30/2023 2:57 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:45:03PM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 5/29/2023 7:48 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:17:54PM +0530, Rajat Khandelwal wrote: > > > > > IOM status has a crucial role during debugging to check the > > > > > current state of the type-C port. > > > > > There are ways to fetch the status, but all those require the > > > > > IOM port status offset, which could change with platform. > > > > > > > > > > Make a debugfs directory for intel_pmc_mux and expose the status > > > > > under it per port basis. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Khandelwal <rajat.khandelwal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Does not apply to my tree :( > > > I have pushed the patch on top of the Linus's tree. > > > Had a quick check with the USB Linux tree and seems like its a lot > > > behind? > > What branch did you use? > > > > Please use the usb-next branch of > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git, which as > > of right now, is at 6.4-rc4 + a bunch of USB-specific patches. > > I see. There is one commit additional in the usb-next tree: > ef0a3642b320 usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Convert to platform remove callback returning void One? I count a lot more: $ git log --oneline main..usb-next | wc -l 143 > Anyways, do you want me to re-work the patch for the usb-next branch? Given that I can not take the patch as-is, it's up to you to rebase it if you wish to have it accepted. Isn't this all covered in the Intel kernel developer training class? thanks, greg k-h
