Hi Vinod, > The is correct, phy interfaces can be improved upon and have been added > upon as and when we have users. > > FWIW there are already usb phy drivers in Generic phy susbystem, so you need > to really justify why you need a new interface? > I will reference the us phy drivers in drivers/phy. Is using usb phy in drivers/phy the right choice? As the following as: drivers/phy/ti/phy-twl4030-usb.c drivers/phy/ti/phy-omap-usb2.c drivers/phy/ti/phy-dm816x-usb.c drivers/phy/phy-lgm-usb.c drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c drivers/phy/motorola/phy-cpcap-usb.c Thanks, Stanley
