Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 01:33:12 schrieb Matthew Garrett: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:09:24PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > That's okay. There's no harm in trying to enable remote wakeup on a > > device which doesn't support it. > > There's harm if we're using the ability to generate remote waleups as a > condition for whether we can perform runtime pm on the device... That I would consider backwards. If the user enables runtime power management of a device, he has to live with remote wakeup being enabled. At most the kernel might resume and switch off remote wakeup on the device, but we might also leave this to user space. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
