On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 19:32 +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 05:25:20PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 14:55 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 12:42 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:22:28AM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > In https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fgregkh%2Fusb.git%2Flog%2F%3Fh%3Dusb-linus&data=05%7C01%7CJoakim.Tjernlund%40infinera.com%7Cf2194123e9144010124708db2fb26a05%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C638156215558797290%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iUBISwWlgbhhLLISwmlCZ1Z9wFlQ21swJGpw7qYpfKw%3D&reserved=0 there UCSI fixes that > > > > > prevent OOPS in stable Linux. > > > > > > > > What specific commit are you concerned about? > > > > > > usb: ucsi_acpi: Increase the command completion timeout > > > usb: ucsi: Fix ucsi->connector race > > > usb: ucsi: Fix NULL pointer deref in ucsi_connector_change() > > > > > > They have been there for 13 days and I started to wonder if they were delayed or marked for a much later release. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't see any of them in Linus tree and wonder if these are planned for later? > > > > > > > > Hopefully they will get sent to Linus later this week. Is there a > > > > specific rush that you need this now? > > > > > > Later this week is fine. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Jocke > > > > > > > I noticed above UCSI patches in the stable queue except this one : "usb: ucsi: Fix ucsi->connector race", > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux.git%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D0482c34ec6f8557e06cd0f8e2d0e20e8ede6a22c&data=05%7C01%7CJoakim.Tjernlund%40infinera.com%7Cf2194123e9144010124708db2fb26a05%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C638156215558797290%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=22y6I4jIU8BZ6dAZZv9pmQ8d4mpyDuqeWvMKh4%2FqPqo%3D&reserved=0 > > Marked for stable, perhaps forgotten ? > > Nope, does not apply: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fall%2F16800048817970%40kroah.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7CJoakim.Tjernlund%40infinera.com%7Cf2194123e9144010124708db2fb26a05%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C638156215558797290%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gaYKVAwEotjXwcIRgFShVyjPOZg3OXXVZ4%2FebWCVLrQ%3D&reserved=0 > (also for other branches.) > > If you can provide a working backport, I will gladly apply it. I did a dry port to 6.1.x and sent it in. Will be some time before it will be tested tough. Sorry. Jocke
