Re: Host CPU busy-looping with aspeed-vhub on C621A

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 04:59:26PM -0700, Zev Weiss wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I'm seeing an odd USB (mis)behavior on an in-progress OpenBMC port I'm
> working on.  The platform is the ASRock Rack SPC621D8HM3, which has an Intel
> C621A chipset and an AST2500 BMC.
> 
> The USB devices present on the system are as follows:
> 
>     # lsusb -t
>     /:  Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/10p, 5000M
>     /:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/16p, 480M
>         |__ Port 8: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/5p, 480M
> 
> (The 5-port hub in the final line is the AST2500's aspeed-vhub device.)
> 
> With the system otherwise idle, the host sits there with an entire CPU core
> tied up busy-looping in what appears to be some USB power-management code,
> with 'top' showing about 75% in a kworker thread and the remaining 25% in
> ksoftirqd.
> 
> Inspecting some workqueue events via ftrace, if I'm interpreting this right
> it appears that hub_event() and pm_runtime_work() are recursively triggering
> each other via queue_work():
> 
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912866: workqueue_execute_start: work struct 00000000de5443e3: function hub_event [usbcore]
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..2.  6520.912873: workqueue_queue_work: work struct=0000000077eccca1 function=pm_runtime_work workqueue=pm req_cpu=256 cpu=18
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..2.  6520.912873: workqueue_activate_work: work struct 0000000077eccca1
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912873: workqueue_execute_end: work struct 00000000de5443e3: function hub_event [usbcore]
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912873: workqueue_execute_start: work struct 0000000077eccca1: function pm_runtime_work
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  6520.912910: workqueue_queue_work: work struct=00000000de5443e3 function=hub_event [usbcore] workqueue=usb_hub_wq req_cpu=256 cpu=18
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  6520.912910: workqueue_activate_work: work struct 00000000de5443e3
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912910: workqueue_execute_end: work struct 0000000077eccca1: function pm_runtime_work
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912910: workqueue_execute_start: work struct 00000000de5443e3: function hub_event [usbcore]
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..2.  6520.912917: workqueue_queue_work: work struct=0000000077eccca1 function=pm_runtime_work workqueue=pm req_cpu=256 cpu=18
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..2.  6520.912917: workqueue_activate_work: work struct 0000000077eccca1
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912918: workqueue_execute_end: work struct 00000000de5443e3: function hub_event [usbcore]
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912918: workqueue_execute_start: work struct 0000000077eccca1: function pm_runtime_work
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  6520.912954: workqueue_queue_work: work struct=00000000de5443e3 function=hub_event [usbcore] workqueue=usb_hub_wq req_cpu=256 cpu=18
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  6520.912954: workqueue_activate_work: work struct 00000000de5443e3
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912954: workqueue_execute_end: work struct 0000000077eccca1: function pm_runtime_work
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912954: workqueue_execute_start: work struct 00000000de5443e3: function hub_event [usbcore]
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..2.  6520.912961: workqueue_queue_work: work struct=0000000077eccca1 function=pm_runtime_work workqueue=pm req_cpu=256 cpu=18
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..2.  6520.912962: workqueue_activate_work: work struct 0000000077eccca1
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  6520.912962: workqueue_execute_end: work struct 00000000de5443e3: function hub_event [usbcore]
> 
> Adding in xhci-hcd events, the event stream pattern becomes:
> 
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  7086.376157: workqueue_execute_start: work struct 00000000de5443e3: function hub_event [usbcore]
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376158: xhci_get_port_status:
> port-8: Powered-off Not-connected Disabled Link:Disabled PortSpeed:0
> OverCurrent Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376165:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-10: Powered-off Not-connected Disabled
> Link:Disabled PortSpeed:0 OverCurrent Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453
> [018] d..1.  7086.376168: xhci_get_port_status: port-12: Powered-off
> Not-connected Disabled Link:Disabled PortSpeed:0 OverCurrent Change: Wake:
> kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..2.  7086.376171: workqueue_queue_work: work
> struct=0000000077eccca1 function=pm_runtime_work workqueue=pm req_cpu=256
> cpu=18
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..2.  7086.376171: workqueue_activate_work: work struct 0000000077eccca1
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  7086.376172: workqueue_execute_end: work struct 00000000de5443e3: function hub_event [usbcore]
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  7086.376172: workqueue_execute_start: work struct 0000000077eccca1: function pm_runtime_work
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376178: xhci_get_port_status:
> port-0: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect PortSpeed:0 Change:
> Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376181:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-1: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect
> PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376184:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-2: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect
> PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376185:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-3: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect
> PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376189:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-4: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect
> PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376193:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-5: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect
> PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376195:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-6: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect
> PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376197:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-7: Powered Connected Enabled Link:U3 PortSpeed:3
> Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376199:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-8: Powered-off Not-connected Disabled
> Link:Disabled PortSpeed:0 OverCurrent Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453
> [018] d..1.  7086.376202: xhci_get_port_status: port-9: Powered
> Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:
> kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376204: xhci_get_port_status:
> port-10: Powered-off Not-connected Disabled Link:Disabled PortSpeed:0
> OverCurrent Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376209:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-11: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect
> PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376212:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-12: Powered-off Not-connected Disabled
> Link:Disabled PortSpeed:0 OverCurrent Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453
> [018] d..1.  7086.376214: xhci_get_port_status: port-13: Powered
> Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:
> kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376216: xhci_get_port_status:
> port-14: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect PortSpeed:0 Change:
> Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376219:
> xhci_get_port_status: port-15: Powered Not-connected Disabled Link:RxDetect
> PortSpeed:0 Change: Wake:     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376221:
> workqueue_queue_work: work struct=00000000de5443e3 function=hub_event
> [usbcore] workqueue=usb_hub_wq req_cpu=256 cpu=18
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] d..1.  7086.376221: workqueue_activate_work: work struct 00000000de5443e3
>     kworker/18:1-453     [018] .....  7086.376221: workqueue_execute_end: work struct 0000000077eccca1: function pm_runtime_work
> 
> (Port 8 has the vhub on it, but I'm not sure what's "special" about ports 10
> and 12 that leads to hub_event apparently checking them but not all the
> others.)

The xhci traces can be a little hard to understand.

> Looking at usbmon's '0u' debugfs file I see a stream of events coming from
> the top-level root_hub that the aspeed-vhub is attached to, which I presume
> are the result of the xhci_get_port_status() calls above:
> 
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339575 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0001 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339576 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339577 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0002 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339578 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339579 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0003 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339581 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339581 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0004 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339583 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339583 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0005 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339585 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339586 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0006 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339587 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339588 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0007 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339589 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339590 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0008 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339592 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 07050000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339592 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0009 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339594 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 08000000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339595 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 000a 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339597 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339597 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 000b 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339599 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 08000000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339600 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 000c 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339602 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339603 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 000d 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339604 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 08000000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339606 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 000e 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339607 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339608 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 000f 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339610 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339611 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0010 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339613 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 00010000
>     ffff9bb240225200 2648339614 S Ii:1:001:1 -115:2048 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339615 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 0009 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339616 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 08000000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339618 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 000b 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339620 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 08000000
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339622 S Ci:1:001:0 s a3 00 0000 000d 0004 4 <
>     ffff9bb242a2d200 2648339624 C Ci:1:001:0 0 4 = 08000000
>     ffff9bb240225200 2648339626 C Ii:1:001:1 -2:2048 0
> 
> However, I do *not* see any activity (increasing numbers) in the xhci_hcd
> line in /proc/interrupts, for what that's worth.

Maybe those events are triggered by a timer, not by an interrupt.

It's worth pointing out the essential information in the usbmon trace.
It says that ports 1-7, 10, 12, and 14-16 are not connected.  Port 8 is 
connected (no surprise).  The remaining three ports (9, 11, and 13) are 
showing an overcurrent (!) condition.

> From everything I can see there's no software activity going on on the BMC
> during this (no aspeed-vhub interrupts or code execution).
> 
> Interestingly, the busy-looping stops and the host CPU goes appropriately
> idle as soon as I add another USB device under the top-level hub, whether
> directly (a thumb drive plugged into a front-panel port) or indirectly under
> the vhub (the OpenBMC iKVM's virtual keyboard/mouse).  However, once any
> other devices are removed and the topology returns to that shown above (just
> the vhub under the top-level hub) the busy-looping resumes.

Adding another device prevents the root hub from going into runtime 
suspend.  Removing all non-hub devices allows runtime suspend.  Clearly 
this must be related to the problem.

> On another system with a similar topology but with a C246 chipset (ASRock
> Rack E3C246D4I) I don't see this happen.
> 
> It also doesn't happen with the factory (AMI) BMC firmware, so it seems like
> it must be a result of something OpenBMC is doing differently with the vhub.
> 
> I'm not terribly familiar with either the kernel USB stack or the
> aspeed-vhub hardware/driver, so any assistance with where to look next on
> this would be much appreciated!

Perhaps the busy-looping shouldn't be a surprise either.  Overcurrent 
conditions don't get tested very much, since they hardly ever happen.  
When they do, the system tries to clear the condition but there's not 
much it can do to remove the underlying cause.

Hopefully this clue will help point you in the right direction.

Alan Stern



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux