Hi, JaeHun Jung <jh0801.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Sometimes very rarely, The count is 0 and the DWC3 flag is set has status. > It must not have these status. Because, It can make happen interrupt storming > status. > So, It have to clean up DWC3_EVENT_PENDING flags set when count is 0. > It means "There are no interrupts to handle.". > > (struct dwc3_event_buffer *) ev_buf = 0xFFFFFF883DBF1180 ( > (void *) buf = 0xFFFFFFC00DBDD000 = end+0x337D000, > (void *) cache = 0xFFFFFF8839F54080, > (unsigned int) length = 0x1000, > (unsigned int) lpos = 0x0, > (unsigned int) count = 0x0, > (unsigned int) flags = 0x00000001, > (dma_addr_t) dma = 0x00000008BD7D7000, > (struct dwc3 *) dwc = 0xFFFFFF8839CBC880, > (u64) android_kabi_reserved1 = 0x0), > > (time = 47557628930999, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628931268, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628932383, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628932652, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628933768, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628934037, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628935152, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628935460, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628936575, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628936845, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628937960, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628938229, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628939345, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628939652, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628940768, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628941037, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628942152, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628942422, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628943537, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628943806, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628944922, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628945229, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628946345, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628946614, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > (time = 47557628947729, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 1), > (time = 47557628947999, irq = 165, fn = dwc3_interrupt, latency = 0, en = 3), > > Signed-off-by: JaeHun Jung <jh0801.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx> Please get in the habit of running patches through scripts/get_maintainer.pl. If you did, it would tell you Thinh is the new maintainer for dwc3. -- balbi
