Re: [PATCH v3] usbnet: optimize usbnet_bh() to reduce CPU load

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





22. 12. 22. 20:13에 Paolo Abeni 이(가) 쓴 글:
On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 16:59 +0900, Leesoo Ahn wrote:
The current source pushes skb into dev->done queue by calling
skb_queue_tail() and then pop it by calling skb_dequeue() to branch to
rx_cleanup state for freeing urb/skb in usbnet_bh(). It takes extra CPU
load, 2.21% (skb_queue_tail) as follows.

-   11.58%     0.26%  swapper          [k] usbnet_bh
    - 11.32% usbnet_bh
       - 6.43% skb_dequeue
            6.34% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
       - 2.21% skb_queue_tail
            2.19% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
       - 1.68% consume_skb
          - 0.97% kfree_skbmem
               0.80% kmem_cache_free
            0.53% skb_release_data

To reduce the extra CPU load use return values jumping to rx_cleanup
state directly to free them instead of calling skb_queue_tail() and
skb_dequeue() for push/pop respectively.

-    7.87%     0.25%  swapper          [k] usbnet_bh
    - 7.62% usbnet_bh
       - 4.81% skb_dequeue
            4.74% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
       - 1.75% consume_skb
          - 0.98% kfree_skbmem
               0.78% kmem_cache_free
            0.58% skb_release_data
         0.53% smsc95xx_rx_fixup

Signed-off-by: Leesoo Ahn <lsahn@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3:
   - Replace return values with proper -ERR values in rx_process()

v2:
   - Replace goto label with return statement to reduce goto entropy
   - Add CPU load information by perf in commit message

v1 at:
   https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20221217161851.829497-1-lsahn@xxxxxxxxxx/

This looks like net-next material.

We have already submitted the networking pull request to Linus
for v6.2 and therefore net-next is closed for new drivers, features,
code refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting
bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after Jan 2nd, including the
expected 'net-next' tag into the subject line

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

[...]

@@ -1528,13 +1526,14 @@ static void usbnet_bh (struct timer_list *t)
  		entry = (struct skb_data *) skb->cb;
  		switch (entry->state) {
  		case rx_done:
-			entry->state = rx_cleanup;
-			rx_process (dev, skb);
+			if (rx_process(dev, skb))
+				goto cleanup;

You can avoid this additional label (which is a little confusing inside
a switch) factoring out a usb_free_skb(skb) helper and calling it here
and under the rx_cleanup case.

Thank you for the information and feedback, it will be in v4 when net-next reopens.

Best regards,
Leesoo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux