Hi,
Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The Rockchip RK3399 DWC3 node has 'power-domain' property which isn't
> allowed by the schema:
>
> usb@fe900000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('power-domains' was unexpected)
>
> Allow DWC3 nodes to have a single power-domains entry. We could instead
> move the power-domains property to the parent wrapper node, but the
> could be an ABI break (Linux shouldn't care). Also, we don't want to
> encourage the pattern of wrapper nodes just to define resources such as
> clocks, resets, power-domains, etc. when not necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml
> index 6d78048c4613..bcefd1c2410a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml
> @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ properties:
> - usb2-phy
> - usb3-phy
>
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
AFAICT this can be incorrect. Also, you could have Cc the dwc3
maintainer to get comments.
@Thinh, how many power rails does dwc3 need? I don't have access to a
databook anymore, but I have a vague memory that different parts of dwc3
could, potentially, be powered by completely separate supplies, no? Or
is that only the case for clock domains in dwc3?
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
