On 11.12.22 13:06, Johan Hovold wrote:
Due to a misunderstanding, a redundant and misleading kernel doc comment for usb_set_intfdata() was recently added which claimed that the driver data pointer must not be cleared during disconnect before "all actions [are] completed", which is both imprecise and incorrect.
OK, but is that a reason to remove all kerneldoc? Kerneldoc is generally a good thing. And if a pointer is NULLed by driver core, that will need to be in it. IMHO you'd better just remove the questionable part of the kerneldoc. Regards Oliver