On Sun, 4 Dec 2022 13:48:07 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > We've seen device access fail with -EPROTO when the device has been
> > recently disconnected and before the USB core had a chance to handle
> > the disconnect hub event. It doesn't make sense to continue on trying
> > to enable host access when the adapter is gone.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
> > index be1e103b7a95..28b31e4da020 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
> > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int asix_check_host_enable(struct usbnet *dev, int in_pm)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < AX_HOST_EN_RETRIES; ++i) {
> > ret = asix_set_sw_mii(dev, in_pm);
> > - if (ret == -ENODEV || ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> > + if (ret == -ENODEV || ret == -ETIMEDOUT || ret == -EPROTO)
>
> It looks like you can put if (ret < 0) here,
Right, or we need a clarification in the commit message why it's okay
to continue for other errors (and continue as if the error didn't
happen, not just retry).
