Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] ehci: Respect IST when scheduling new split iTDs.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Clemens Ladisch wrote:

> > But with xHCI, the hardware does all the scheduling as soon as an
> > altsetting is installed.
> 
> As far as I understand the spec, this is the intended (or at least
> allowed) behaviour for all HCs.

To my knowledge, the spec doesn't discuss this one way or another.

>  And it would be a benefit for drivers
> if a successful set_interface guaranteed that submitting isoc URBs will
> not fail due to missing bandwidth.

That's true, but there is a tradeoff.  It would mean that the system
couldn't overcommit periodic bandwidth, even if the overcommitted
resources weren't being used.

Doing this would require changing almost all the HCDs, unfortunately.  
But there's no reason we can't change them one at a time.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux