On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:19:04AM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 08:59:04AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 08:57:19AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 08:55:43AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 07:22:43AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git usb-testing > > > > > head: 465d4dd073f72a6348577ed0f7aa4aa00c9264bc > > > > > commit: a6f523ee41bfe7ef71110d4ae556339d0520efdd [2/23] usb: gadget: uvc: add validate and fix function for uvc response > > > > > > > > Michael, I'll drop this commit from my tree now, please fix up and > > > > resend. > > > > > > Nevermind, I fixed it up myself, it was trivial. > > > > And now ignore this, I've dropped it again based on Laurent's review. > > > > Did you drop it because of the question why this is a good idea? Yes. > If so I will improve the commit message. IMHO it totally makes sense to > have some sort of validation in the uvc gadget. > > The version v7 he commented on was not the one you took on the > usb-testing tree. Ok, submit a new one so that everyone can agree please. thanks, greg k-h
