On 17/10/2022 10:36, Jim Lin wrote:
On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 12:45 +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 12/10/2022 11:25, Jim Lin wrote:
Program USB2 pad PD controls during port connect/disconnect, port
suspend/resume, and test mode, to reduce power consumption on
disconnect or suspend.
Signed-off-by: Jim Lin <jilin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Fix issue that wrong tegra->phys[] may be accessed on tegra124
v3: No change on copyright
drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c | 139
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 138 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-
tegra.c
index c8af2cd2216d..996182a1959f 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
@@ -189,6 +189,13 @@ struct tegra_xusb_context_soc {
} fpci;
};
+enum tegra_xhci_phy_type {
+ USB3_PHY,
+ USB2_PHY,
+ HSIC_PHY,
+ MAX_PHY_TYPES,
+};
+
struct tegra_xusb_soc {
const char *firmware;
const char * const *supply_names;
@@ -274,9 +281,17 @@ struct tegra_xusb {
bool suspended;
struct tegra_xusb_context context;
+ u32 enable_utmi_pad_after_lp0_exit;
};
static struct hc_driver __read_mostly tegra_xhci_hc_driver;
+static int (*original_xhci_hub_control)(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16
typeReq, u16 wValue, u16 wIndex,
+ char *buf, u16 wLength);
Is it better to add this function pointer to the tegra_xusb
structure?
Jon
Do you mean removing variable "original_xhci_hub_control" and save
function pointer to the tegra_xusb structure ?
But that doesn't look possible over here to point to tegra_xusb
structure and save pointer (to tegra_xhci_hc_driver.hub_control) into
it.
Ah yes, this is in the init function and so we can't do that. Any issue
with calling xhci_hub_control() directly in the function
tegra_xhci_hub_control()?
Jon
--
nvpublic
