Hi Andy,
Thanks for the set.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 05:28:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It's not fully correct to take a const parameter pointer to a struct
> and return a non-const pointer to a member of that struct.
I guess you could go as far as saying it's not at all correct. :-)
>
> Instead, introduce a const version of the dev_fwnode() API which takes
> and returns const pointers and use it where it's applicable.
>
> Suggested-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: aade55c86033 ("device property: Add const qualifier to device_get_match_data() parameter")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For the set:
Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
