On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 04:09:52PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 24 July 2022 15:08:09 Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 02:59:08PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Sunday 24 July 2022 14:54:58 Johan Hovold wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 02:33:51PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > > What is updated is the real baudrate in c_ispeed and c_ospeed > > > > > extensions. > > > > > > > > > > It is really wrong? I thought that c_cflag should stay unchanged at > > > > > B38400 when ASYNC_SPD_CUST is used. > > > > > > > > Yeah, cflags stay unchanged, but you shouldn't touch those fields when > > > > using the deprecated ASYNC_SPD_CUST hack. > > > > > > Hm... Why? I thought that new extended fields (c_ispeed and c_ospeed) > > > should contain current real speed. What is the reason that c_*speed > > > fields should have 38400 when ASYNC_SPD_CUST hack is set? > > > > Because we shouldn't go adding new features built around the deprecated > > ASYNC_SPD_CUST hack. > > But this is not a new feature in the old deprecated hack. It for the > new interface. I think I understand what you're getting at, but no. Let's not add more features built around ASYNC_SPD_CUST. Johan
