On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:59:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
> > so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
> > device property API.
> >
> > I believe that the only reason the driver, instead of the standard
> > devm_gpiod_get(), used devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() is because it
> > wanted to set up a pretty consumer name for the GPIO, and we now have
> > a special API for that.
>
> ...
>
> > - gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev, np,
> > - "nvidia,phy-reset-gpio",
> > - 0, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
> > - "ulpi_phy_reset_b");
> > + gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "nvidia,phy-reset",
> > + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(gpiod);
>
> What does _OR_ZERO mean now?
This converts a pointer to an error code if a pointer represents
ERR_PTR() encoded error, or 0 to indicate success.
static inline int __must_check PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(__force const void *ptr)
{
if (IS_ERR(ptr))
return PTR_ERR(ptr);
else
return 0;
}
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
