"Subbrathnam, Swaminathan" <swami.iyer@xxxxxx> writes: > Sergei, > > I am pretty fine with both DA8xx and DMxxx devices being located in mach-davinci directory. Let us not fault Kevin for it and as I see it, it was and is a community enabled decision. Both architectures share some essential similarities. > > The point I am trying to make here is that functionalities such as OHCI and PHY definitions dependant on CFGCHIP register and their hookups etc. are unique to DA8xx family from USB perspective. > > Whereas DMxxxx family of devices share a common definition sets for PHY and do not share any similarity with DA8xx in the way they are connected to the subsystem and they do not have OHCI interface. > > Given this I definitely feel the need to 2 separate header files. > > Either way if the general consensus is to have a single usb.h for the whole of DaVinci platform I am fine with that too. > > I will wait for Kevin's and community's input. > Please keep a single, combined <mach/usb.h> Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
