On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 13:23:06 +0800 Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Care to send me a patch, and I'll just include it in my series? > Seems no need add another patch, just modify this patch as below: > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_trace.h > b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_trace.h > index a09deae1146f..03d2a9bac27e 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_trace.h > +++ b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_trace.h > @@ -18,18 +18,16 @@ > > #include "mtu3.h" > > -#define MTU3_MSG_MAX 256 > - > TRACE_EVENT(mtu3_log, > TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, struct va_format *vaf), > TP_ARGS(dev, vaf), > TP_STRUCT__entry( > __string(name, dev_name(dev)) > - __dynamic_array(char, msg, MTU3_MSG_MAX) > + __vstring(msg, vaf->fmt, vaf->va) > ), > TP_fast_assign( > __assign_str(name, dev_name(dev)); > - vsnprintf(__get_str(msg), MTU3_MSG_MAX, vaf->fmt, *vaf- > >va); > + __assign_vstr(msg, vaf->fmt, vaf->va); > ), > TP_printk("%s: %s", __get_str(name), __get_str(msg)) > ); > > > > remove below two lines > " > -#define MTU3_MSG_MAX 256 > - Fine. Even though I already pushed to linux-next, I did something I seldom do. I rebased my for-next branch and removed this patch. I'll send a v2. -- Steve