Re: [PATCH 08/36] target: Refactor core_tmr_abort_task

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/7/2022, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 04:35:14PM -0700, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>> Minor refactoring of core_tmr_abort_task to avoid duplicate code. No
>> functional change here.
> Regardless that previous patch on that place is incorrect,
> this patch also breaks the statistic counters.
> dev->aborts_no_task counter is incremented on the end of the function,
> and should not be incremented for the case when command to be aborted is
> found.

Ah... I missed that. Thanks for the catch.

Thinh

>> Signed-off-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c | 6 ++----
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
>> index 718d985e4860..3e73f60319d5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
>> @@ -158,15 +158,13 @@ void core_tmr_abort_task(
>>   			list_del_init(&se_cmd->state_list);
>>   			target_put_cmd_and_wait(se_cmd);
>>   
>> -			pr_err("ABORT_TASK: Sending TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE for ref_tag: %llu\n",
>> -			       ref_tag);
>> -			tmr->response = TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE;
>>   			atomic_long_inc(&dev->aborts_complete);
>> -			return;
>> +			goto exit;
>>   		}
>>   		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->queues[i].lock, flags);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +exit:
>>   	printk("ABORT_TASK: Sending TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE for ref_tag: %lld\n",
>>   			tmr->ref_task_tag);
>>   	tmr->response = TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE;





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux