On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 03:18:59PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> Use snprintf instead of sprintf which could cause buffer overflow.
How can it cause an overflow?
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h | 4 +++-
> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h
> index 8408e1b1a24a..9893dd1bafbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ struct mtu3_request;
>
> #define BULK_CLKS_CNT 4
>
> +#define MTU3_EP_NAME_LEN 12
> +
> /* device operated link and speed got from DEVICE_CONF register */
> enum mtu3_speed {
> MTU3_SPEED_INACTIVE = 0,
> @@ -272,7 +274,7 @@ struct ssusb_mtk {
> */
> struct mtu3_ep {
> struct usb_ep ep;
> - char name[12];
> + char name[MTU3_EP_NAME_LEN];
> struct mtu3 *mtu;
> u8 epnum;
> u8 type;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_debugfs.c b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_debugfs.c
> index d27de647c86a..a6f72494b819 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_debugfs.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static void mtu3_debugfs_regset(struct mtu3 *mtu, void __iomem *base,
> if (!mregs)
> return;
>
> - sprintf(mregs->name, "%s", name);
> + snprintf(mregs->name, MTU3_DEBUGFS_NAME_LEN, "%s", name);
Where does name come from? It looks like you control this string, so
there is no overflow anywhere.
> regset = &mregs->regset;
> regset->regs = regs;
> regset->nregs = nregs;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c
> index 30999b4debb8..a751e0533c2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c
> @@ -635,8 +635,8 @@ static void init_hw_ep(struct mtu3 *mtu, struct mtu3_ep *mep,
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mep->req_list);
>
> - sprintf(mep->name, "ep%d%s", epnum,
> - !epnum ? "" : (is_in ? "in" : "out"));
> + snprintf(mep->name, MTU3_EP_NAME_LEN, "ep%d%s", epnum,
> + !epnum ? "" : (is_in ? "in" : "out"));
Same here, you already control this string size, so where is the issue?
thanks,
greg k-h
