Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: Add DP out resource when DP tunnel is discovered.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/7/2022 4:44 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 04:01:12PM +0530, Sanjay R Mehta wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/6/2022 5:30 PM, Sanjay R Mehta wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/6/2022 11:55 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 12:39:38AM -0500, Sanjay R Mehta wrote:
>>>>> From: Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> If the boot firmware implements a connection manager of its
>>>>> own it may create a DP tunnel and will be handed off to Linux
>>>>> CM, but the DP out resource is not saved in the dp_resource
>>>>> list.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds tunnelled DP out port to the dp_resource list
>>>>> once the DP tunnel is discovered.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c     | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>>>  drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h     |  1 +
>>>>>  drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c |  2 ++
>>>>>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
>>>>> index 9a3214f..dcd0c3e 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
>>>>> @@ -1006,6 +1006,21 @@ static void tb_dp_resource_unavailable(struct tb *tb, struct tb_port *port)
>>>>>  	tb_tunnel_dp(tb);
>>>>>  }
>>>>>  
>>>>> +void tb_dp_resource_available_discovered(struct tb *tb, struct tb_port *port)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	struct tb_cm *tcm = tb_priv(tb);
>>>>> +	struct tb_port *p;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	list_for_each_entry(p, &tcm->dp_resources, list) {
>>>>> +		if (p == port)
>>>>> +			return;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	tb_port_dbg(port, "DP %s resource available discovered\n",
>>>>> +		    tb_port_is_dpin(port) ? "IN" : "OUT");
>>>>> +	list_add_tail(&port->list, &tcm->dp_resources);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>>  static void tb_dp_resource_available(struct tb *tb, struct tb_port *port)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>  	struct tb_cm *tcm = tb_priv(tb);
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
>>>>> index 4602c69..cef2fe3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
>>>>> @@ -1222,6 +1222,7 @@ struct usb4_port *usb4_port_device_add(struct tb_port *port);
>>>>>  void usb4_port_device_remove(struct usb4_port *usb4);
>>>>>  int usb4_port_device_resume(struct usb4_port *usb4);
>>>>>  
>>>>> +void tb_dp_resource_available_discovered(struct tb *tb, struct tb_port *port);
>>>>
>>>> Why not put this in the .h file next to the other tb_* calls?
>>>>
>>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> I forgot to explain that in this function, I have used a structure
>> "struct tb_cm" which is defined and used only in tb.c file. Hence have
>> to keep this function in tb.c file.
> 
> To be more specific, I mean why not put it below the line:
> 	int tb_dp_port_enable(struct tb_port *port, bool enable);
> in this .h file in an attempt to keep things orderly.
> 

I get it now. My bad :).

Will send the change.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux