On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:45 AM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Il 14/06/22 18:57, Prashant Malani ha scritto:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 1:18 AM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Il 09/06/22 20:09, Prashant Malani ha scritto:
> >>> When the DT node has "switches" available, register a Type-C mode-switch
> >>> for each listed "switch". This allows the driver to receive state
> >>> information about what operating mode a Type-C port and its connected
> >>> peripherals are in, as well as status information (like VDOs) related to
> >>> that state.
> >>>
> >>> The callback function is currently a stub, but subsequent patches will
> >>> implement the required functionality.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v2:
> >>> - No changes.
> >>>
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.h | 6 ++
> >>> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> >>> index 07ed44c6b839..d41a21103bd3 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> >>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >>> #include <linux/slab.h>
> >>> #include <linux/types.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/usb/typec_mux.h>
> >>> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >>>
> >>> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> >>> @@ -2581,9 +2582,59 @@ static void anx7625_runtime_disable(void *data)
> >>> pm_runtime_disable(data);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static int anx7625_typec_mux_set(struct typec_mux_dev *mux,
> >>> + struct typec_mux_state *state)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int anx7625_register_mode_switch(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
> >>> + struct anx7625_data *ctx)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct anx7625_port_data *port_data;
> >>> + struct typec_mux_desc mux_desc = {};
> >>> + char name[32];
> >>> + u32 port_num;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &port_num);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (port_num >= ctx->num_typec_switches) {
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid port number specified: %d\n", port_num);
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + port_data = &ctx->typec_ports[port_num];
> >>> + port_data->ctx = ctx;
> >>> + mux_desc.fwnode = &node->fwnode;
> >>> + mux_desc.drvdata = port_data;
> >>> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%u", node->name, port_num);
> >>> + mux_desc.name = name;
> >>> + mux_desc.set = anx7625_typec_mux_set;
> >>> +
> >>> + port_data->typec_mux = typec_mux_register(dev, &mux_desc);
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(port_data->typec_mux)) {
> >>> + ret = PTR_ERR(port_data->typec_mux);
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "Mode switch register for port %d failed: %d", port_num, ret);
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> Please return 0 at the end of this function.
> >>
> >> if (IS_ERR(....)) {
> >> ......code......
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >
> > May I ask why? We're not missing any return paths. I would rather we
> > keep it as is (which has the valid return value).
> >
>
> I know that you're not missing any return paths.
>
> That's only because the proposed one is a common pattern in the kernel
> and it's only for consistency.
Thanks for the additional details. Since this isn't addressing any
specific bug, and I
notice varied usages of "return ret" in this file itself [1][2], I'd
prefer keeping it as is.
[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c#L296
[2]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c#L436
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
