On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 14:01 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 12/05/22 08:49, Chunfeng Yun ha scritto:
> > Due to the scheduler allocates the optimal bandwidth for FS ISOC
> > endpoints,
> > this may be not enough actually and causes data transfer error, so
> > come up
> > with an estimate that is no less than the worst case bandwidth used
> > for
> > any one mframe, but may be an over-estimate.
> >
> > Fixes: 451d3912586a ("usb: xhci-mtk: update fs bus bandwidth by
> > bw_budget_table")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hello Chunfeng,
> I agree this is "a fix"... but is it the best fix?
>
> Shooting the bandwidth very high will have power consumption
> consequences, are
> those measurable?
This is usually limited into one interval; e.g. the last interval
transfers 8 bytes in fact, but I assume it may transfer 188 bytes, I
think the consumption increase can be ignored.
> And if they are, what is the expected power consumption increase in
> percentage
> (and/or microamperes)? Also, out of the expected increase, have you
> got any
> measurement for that?
>
> Assuming that the measurement is done for one SoC, it's possible to
> make some
> assumption about a different part.
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c | 16 +++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
> > b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
> > index f3139ce7b0a9..953d2cd1d4cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
