On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:19:25AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:06:17PM +0900, Jung Daehwan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:19:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 06:18:45PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote:
> > > > To enable supporting for USB offload, define "offload" in usb controller
> > > > node of device tree. "offload" value can be used to determine which type
> > > > of offload was been enabled in the SoC.
> > > >
> > > > For example:
> > > >
> > > > &usbdrd_dwc3 {
> > > > ...
> > > > /* support usb offloading, 0: disabled, 1: audio */
> > > > offload = <1>;
> > > > ...
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > There are several vendor_ops introduced by this patch:
> > > >
> > > > struct xhci_vendor_ops - function callbacks for vendor specific operations
> > > > {
> > > > @vendor_init:
> > > > - called for vendor init process during xhci-plat-hcd
> > > > probe.
> > > > @vendor_cleanup:
> > > > - called for vendor cleanup process during xhci-plat-hcd
> > > > remove.
> > > > @is_usb_offload_enabled:
> > > > - called to check if usb offload enabled.
> > > > @alloc_dcbaa:
> > > > - called when allocating vendor specific dcbaa during
> > > > memory initializtion.
> > > > @free_dcbaa:
> > > > - called to free vendor specific dcbaa when cleanup the
> > > > memory.
> > > > @alloc_transfer_ring:
> > > > - called when vendor specific transfer ring allocation is required
> > > > @free_transfer_ring:
> > > > - called to free vendor specific transfer ring
> > > > @sync_dev_ctx:
> > > > - called when synchronization for device context is required
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > The xhci hooks with prefix "xhci_vendor_" on the ops in xhci_vendor_ops.
> > > > For example, vendor_init ops will be invoked by xhci_vendor_init() hook,
> > > > is_usb_offload_enabled ops will be invoked by
> > > > xhci_vendor_is_usb_offload_enabled(), and so on.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: J. Avila <elavila@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Puma Hsu <pumahsu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Howard Yen <howardyen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 5 ++
> > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 44 +++++++++++-
> > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.h | 8 +++
> > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 46 ++++++++++++
> > > > 6 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Why do you need to "override" anything? Why can't these just be added
> > > to the current xhci_plat_priv structure and used that way like the
> > > current xhci platform interface works?
> > >
> >
> > "override" means above xhci hooks? Above hooks are for ring management.
> > In fact, xhci platform doesn't care ring management. That's why I've added hooks
> > not used xhci_plat_priv.
>
> Why not add ring management ability to the platform interface instead?
> That's what you want to control here, in your platform driver, right?
>
I think xhci platform driver is separated from ring management. I don't
want to disturb current design.
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
> > > > index 841617952ac7..e07c9c132061 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
> > > > @@ -535,8 +535,13 @@ static int xhci_stop_device(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, int slot_id, int suspend)
> > > > cmd->status == COMP_COMMAND_RING_STOPPED) {
> > > > xhci_warn(xhci, "Timeout while waiting for stop endpoint command\n");
> > > > ret = -ETIME;
> > > > + goto cmd_cleanup;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + ret = xhci_vendor_sync_dev_ctx(xhci, slot_id);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + xhci_warn(xhci, "Sync device context failed, ret=%d\n", ret);
> > >
> > > Shouldn't the function have spit out an error if there was a problem?
> >
> > It just reads and sync information about device context. That's why I think
> > it's not critical to go error routime. But it needs to discuss.
>
> Ok, it looks like this follows the other ways this driver works, that's
> fine.
>
OK. Thanks.
> > > And no documentiaon for these global function?
> > >
> >
> > I thought there's no need to add documentation. They are just functions to call
> > vendor ops and there's documentation of vendor ops above. I could add it if needed.
>
> Always try to add documentation for when you want others to use the new
> functions, as it helps explain how to use them.
>
OK. I will add it on next submission.
Best Regards,
Jung Daehwan
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
