Re: Re: [PATCH 09/11] drivers: infiniband: hw: Fix deadlock in irdma_cleanup_cm_core()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:24:56 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote:

> > There is a deadlock in irdma_cleanup_cm_core(), which is shown
> > below:
> > 
> >    (Thread 1)              |      (Thread 2)
> >                            | irdma_schedule_cm_timer()
> > irdma_cleanup_cm_core()    |  add_timer()
> >  spin_lock_irqsave() //(1) |  (wait a time)
> >  ...                       | irdma_cm_timer_tick()
> >  del_timer_sync()          |  spin_lock_irqsave() //(2)
> >  (wait timer to stop)      |  ...
> > 
> > We hold cm_core->ht_lock in position (1) of thread 1 and
> > use del_timer_sync() to wait timer to stop, but timer handler
> > also need cm_core->ht_lock in position (2) of thread 2.
> > As a result, irdma_cleanup_cm_core() will block forever.
> > 
> > This patch extracts del_timer_sync() from the protection of
> > spin_lock_irqsave(), which could let timer handler to obtain
> > the needed lock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/cm.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/cm.c
> > index dedb3b7edd8..019dd8bfe08 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/cm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/cm.c
> > @@ -3252,8 +3252,11 @@ void irdma_cleanup_cm_core(struct irdma_cm_core *cm_core)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&cm_core->ht_lock, flags);
> > -	if (timer_pending(&cm_core->tcp_timer))
> > +	if (timer_pending(&cm_core->tcp_timer)) {
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm_core->ht_lock, flags);
> >  		del_timer_sync(&cm_core->tcp_timer);
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&cm_core->ht_lock, flags);
> > +	}
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm_core->ht_lock, flags);
> 
> This lock doesn't seem to be protecting anything.  Also do we need to
> check timer_pending()?  I think the del_timer_sync() function will just
> return directly if there isn't a pending lock?

Thanks a lot for your advice, I will remove the timer_pending() and the
redundant lock.

Best regards,
Duoming Zhou




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux