On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:41:23AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/03/2022 03:58, Jung Daehwan wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:59:06AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 04/03/2022 07:23, Daehwan Jung wrote: > >>> Export symbols for xhci hooks usage: > >>> xhci_ring_free > >>> - Allow xhci hook to free xhci_ring. > >> > >> Instead of copying-pasting the name of function, please explain why do > >> you need these symbols exported. > >> > >> The "Why" is actually one of most important questions, because "what is > >> this patch doing" we can easily see... > >> > >>> > >>> xhci_get_slot_ctx > >>> - Allow xhci hook to get slot_ctx from the xhci_container_ctx > >>> for getting the slot_ctx information to know which slot is > >>> offloading and compare the context in remote subsystem memory > >>> if needed. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Krzysztof > >> > > > > Hi Krzysztof > > > > xhci_ring_free has been removed from v3.. > > The reason why I want to export is for managing vendor specific ring. > > I want to alloc and free vendor specific ring on specific address. > > It's done with xhci hooks. > > It's better, but still does not explain why these have to be exported. > Please mention where are these hooks going to be. Where are they > implemented. I actually expect all of these exports to be used in your > patchset. All exports _HAVE_ to be used by the patchset. Otherwise it's an invalid submission. thanks, greg k-h
