On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 02:28:40PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:29:36AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:13:33PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:47:57AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:03:18PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > This does not apply on top of Greg's latest usb-next branch. You need > > > > > to rebase this. There are also a few more nitpicks below. > > > > > > > > Hi, I didn't found tcpci.h in include/linux/usb/ > > > > > > I'm asking you to create the file. > > > > > > So create a separate patch where you move the register definitions and > > > command definitions from drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h to > > > include/linux/usb/tcpci.h > > Hi heikki, I'm confused, do you mean move total tcpci.h to > > include/linux/usb/ directory or just move our driver patch used register > > definitions and command to "include/linux/usb/tcpci.h"? > > > > And I think the other way is, our driver patch just include > > "tcpm/tcpci.h" is better(no need to create new file). What do you think? > > I would prefer that you just introduce the global header for them. Hi heikki, I'll try to move the tcpci.h as global header. Thanks, Xin > > thanks, > > -- > heikki