On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 03:23:54PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote: > This patchset is for USB offload feature, which makes Co-processor to use > some memories of xhci. Especially it's useful for USB Audio scenario. > Audio stream would get shortcut because Co-processor directly write/read > data in xhci memories. It could get speed-up using faster memory like SRAM. > That's why this also gives vendors flexibilty of memory management. > Below pathches have been merged in AOSP kernel(android12-5.10) and I put > together and split into 3 patches. Plus let me add user(xhci-exynos) module > to see how user could use it. > > To sum up, it's for providing xhci memories to Co-Processor. > It would cover DCBAA, Device Context, Tranfer Ring, Event Ring, ERST. > It needs xhci hooks and to export some xhci symbols. > > ANDROID: usb: host: fix slab-out-of-bounds in xhci_vendor_get_ops > ANDROID: usb: export built-in tracepoint functions > ANDROID: usb: host: Use old init scheme when hook unavailable > ANDROID: usb: host: free the offload TR by vendor hook > ANDROID: usb: host: xhci: provide function prototype for xhci_address_device > ANDROID: usb: host: add bus_suspend/bus_resume to xhci overrides > ANDROID: usb: host: add address_device to xhci overrides > ANDROID: usb: host: add max packet parameter on alloc_transfer_ring hook > ANDROID: usb: host: add xhci hooks for vendor specific container context > ANDROID: usb: host: export xhci symbols for ring management > ANDROID: usb: host: export additional xhci symbols for ring management > FROMLIST: usb: xhci-plat: add xhci_plat_priv_overwrite > FROMLIST: usb: host: export symbols for xhci hooks usage > FROMLIST: usb: host: add xhci hooks for USB offload What does that list of text mean? You are only submitting 4 patches here, not that many. > > Below are owners of patches. > > Howard Yen <howardyen@xxxxxxxxxx> > Jack Pham <jackp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Puma Hsu <pumahsu@xxxxxxxxxx> > J. Avila <elavila@xxxxxxxxxx> > chihhao.chen <chihhao.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> What do you mean by this? Did you loose authorship of the code you just submitted? That's not ok. You always have to properly credit the creators of the changes you submit to us for obvious legal reasons. Please fix up and resend this series properly. thanks, greg k-h
