On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:26:46PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2022-02-23 14:21:32 [+0100], Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Is this 5.17 material? Or is 5.18 fine, too? > > 5.18 is fine. I intend to push into the RT-stable trees and this can't > be backported without 1/7 and it does not affect !RT so I wouldn't > bother. Ok, applied to for-next then. Thanks for the heads up!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
