On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 06:44:05PM +0530, Husni Faiz wrote: > This patch fixes "spaces required around that '?'" checkpatch error > Added a space before the "?" ternary operator. > > Signed-off-by: Husni Faiz <ahamedhusni73@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > V1->V2 : Separated the style changes into multiple patches. > > drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c > index 8a60c0d56863..1fcdfb7d118c 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c > @@ -1403,7 +1403,7 @@ static int cp210x_tiocmget(struct tty_struct *tty) > |((control & CONTROL_RTS) ? TIOCM_RTS : 0) > |((control & CONTROL_CTS) ? TIOCM_CTS : 0) > |((control & CONTROL_DSR) ? TIOCM_DSR : 0) > - |((control & CONTROL_RING)? TIOCM_RI : 0) > + |((control & CONTROL_RING) ? TIOCM_RI : 0) > |((control & CONTROL_DCD) ? TIOCM_CD : 0); I'm pretty sure the author intended the TIOCM arguments to be aligned here. But in any case, I'm not taking checkpatch.pl clean ups unless you're also doing real changes to the code in question. > dev_dbg(&port->dev, "%s - control = 0x%02x\n", __func__, control); Johan
