On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 08:57:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 02:29:55PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote:
> > There's no lock for rndis response list. It could cause list corruption
> > if two different list_add at the same time like below.
> > It's better to add in rndis_add_response / rndis_free_response
> > / rndis_get_next_response to prevent any race condition on response list.
> >
> > [ 361.894299] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] list_add corruption.
> > next->prev should be prev (ffffff80651764d0),
> > but was ffffff883dc36f80. (next=ffffff80651764d0).
> >
> > [ 361.904380] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] Call trace:
> > [ 361.904391] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] __list_add_valid+0x74/0x90
> > [ 361.904401] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] rndis_msg_parser+0x168/0x8c0
> > [ 361.904409] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] rndis_command_complete+0x24/0x84
> > [ 361.904417] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] usb_gadget_giveback_request+0x20/0xe4
> > [ 361.904426] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] dwc3_gadget_giveback+0x44/0x60
> > [ 361.904434] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] dwc3_ep0_complete_data+0x1e8/0x3a0
> > [ 361.904442] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] dwc3_ep0_interrupt+0x29c/0x3dc
> > [ 361.904450] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] dwc3_process_event_entry+0x78/0x6cc
> > [ 361.904457] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] dwc3_process_event_buf+0xa0/0x1ec
> > [ 361.904465] [1: irq/191-dwc3:16979] dwc3_thread_interrupt+0x34/0x5c
> >
> > Fixes: f6281af9d62e ("usb: gadget: rndis: use list_for_each_entry_safe")
> > Signed-off-by: Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c
> > index b7ccf1803656..b4d58324e2d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c
> > @@ -1011,16 +1011,21 @@ void rndis_add_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rndis_add_hdr);
> >
> > +/* add spinlock to prevent race condition for rndis response list */
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(resp_lock);
>
> Shouldn't this be one lock per rndis_params structure, and not a global
> one for the whole driver?
>
I agree with your comment. I'm going to modify and push it again.
Thanks for the comment.
Best Regards,
Jung Daehwan
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
