On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:47 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 09:38, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > There are two main downsides: > > > > - rather than using a dynamically sized pool, this buffer needs > > to be allocated at probe time using a fixed size. Without > > having any idea of what it should be, I picked a size of > > 64KB, which is between what the other two OHCI front-ends use > > in their SRAM. If anyone has a better idea what that size > > is reasonable, this can be trivially changed. > > > > I suppose this is a problem if the driver falls back to ordinary DRAM > once the allocation runs out?
