1."What problem?
r8152_submit_rx needs to detach netdev if -ENODEV happened, but -ENODEV
will never happen
because xhci_urb_enqueue only returns -EINVAL if the return value of
xhci_check_args <= 0. So
r8152_submit_rx will will call napi_schedule to re-submit that urb, and
this will cause infinite urb
submission.
The whole point is, if xhci_check_args returns value A,
xhci_urb_enqueque shouldn't return any
other value, because that will change some driver's behavior(like r8152.c).
2."So if 0 is returned, you will now return that here, is that ok?
That is a change in functionality.
But this can only ever be the case for a root hub, is that ok?"
It's the same logic, but now xhci_urb_enqueue can return -ENODEV if xHC
is halted.
If it happens on a root hub, xhci_urb_enqueue won't be called.
3."Again, this means all is good? Why is this being called for a root hub?"
It is the same logic with the old one, but now
xhci_check_streams_endpoint can return -ENODEV if xHC is halted.
thanks
Hongyu Xie
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 22:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 05:41:26PM +0800, Hongyu Xie wrote:
From: Hongyu Xie <xiehongyu1@xxxxxxxxxx>
xhci_check_args returns 4 types of value, -ENODEV, -EINVAL, 1 and 0.
xhci_urb_enqueue and xhci_check_streams_endpoint return -EINVAL if
the return value of xhci_check_args <= 0.
This will cause a problem.
What problem?
For example, r8152_submit_rx calling usb_submit_urb in
drivers/net/usb/r8152.c.
r8152_submit_rx will never get -ENODEV after submiting an urb
when xHC is halted,
because xhci_urb_enqueue returns -EINVAL in the very beginning.
Fixes: 203a86613fb3 ("xhci: Avoid NULL pointer deref when host dies.")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hongyu Xie <xiehongyu1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index dc357cabb265..a7a55dd206fe 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -1604,9 +1604,12 @@ static int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flag
struct urb_priv *urb_priv;
int num_tds;
- if (!urb || xhci_check_args(hcd, urb->dev, urb->ep,
- true, true, __func__) <= 0)
+ if (!urb)
return -EINVAL;
+ ret = xhci_check_args(hcd, urb->dev, urb->ep,
+ true, true, __func__);
+ if (ret <= 0)
+ return ret;
So if 0 is returned, you will now return that here, is that ok?
That is a change in functionality.
But this can only ever be the case for a root hub, is that ok?
slot_id = urb->dev->slot_id;
ep_index = xhci_get_endpoint_index(&urb->ep->desc);
@@ -3323,7 +3326,7 @@ static int xhci_check_streams_endpoint(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
return -EINVAL;
ret = xhci_check_args(xhci_to_hcd(xhci), udev, ep, 1, true, __func__);
if (ret <= 0)
- return -EINVAL;
+ return ret;
Again, this means all is good? Why is this being called for a root hub?
thanks,
greg k-h
