Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking. On 04.12.21 01:40, Leo Li wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 4:45 PM >> To: regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; >> Eugene_Bordenkircher@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc- >> dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; balbi@xxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: bug: usb: gadget: FSL_UDC_CORE Corrupted request list leads to >> unrecoverable loop. >> >> On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 20:35 +0000, Leo Li wrote: >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 8:19 AM >>>> To: regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; >>>> Eugene_Bordenkircher@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >>>> linuxppc- dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; balbi@xxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: Re: bug: usb: gadget: FSL_UDC_CORE Corrupted request list >>>> leads to unrecoverable loop. >>>> >>>> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 12:56 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 23:48 +0000, Eugene Bordenkircher wrote: >>>>>> Agreed, >>>>>> >>>>>> We are happy pick up the torch on this, but I'd like to try and >>>>>> hear from >>>> Joakim first before we do. The patch set is his, so I'd like to >>>> give him the opportunity. I think he's the only one that can add a >>>> truly proper description as well because he mentioned that this >>>> includes a "few more fixes" than just the one we ran into. I'd >>>> rather hear from him than try to reverse engineer what was being >> addressed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Joakim, if you are still watching the thread, would you like to >>>>>> take a stab >>>> at it? If I don't hear from you in a couple days, we'll pick up the >>>> torch and do what we can. Did anything happen? Sure, it's a old regression from the v3.4-rc4 days, but there iirc was already a tested proto-patch in that thread that fixes the issue. Or was progress made and I just missed it? Ciao, Thorsten P.S.: As a Linux kernel regression tracker I'm getting a lot of reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them. Unfortunately therefore I sometimes will get things wrong or miss something important. I hope that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me about it in a public reply, that's in everyone's interest. BTW, I have no personal interest in this issue, which is tracked using regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot (https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/). I'm only posting this mail to get things rolling again and hence don't need to be CC on all further activities wrt to this regression. #regzbot ignore-activity >>>>> I am far away from this now and still on 4.19. I don't mind if you >>>>> tweak >>>> tweak the patches for better "upstreamability" >>>> >>>> Even better would be to migrate to the chipidea driver, I am told >>>> just a few tweaks are needed but this is probably something NXP >>>> should do as they have access to other SOC's using chipidea. >>> >>> I agree with this direction but the problem was with bandwidth. As this >> controller was only used on legacy platforms, it is harder to justify new effort >> on it now. >> >> Legacy? All PPC is legacy and not supported now? > > I'm not saying that they are not supported, but they are in maintenance only mode.
