Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 03 Dec 2021, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> This I don't understand. If we have for example >> >> new_tx = 0 >> max = 0 >> min = 1514(=datagram) + 8(=ndp) + 2(=1+1) * 4(=dpe) + 12(=nth) = 1542 >> >> then >> >> max = max(min, max) = 1542 >> val = clamp_t(u32, new_tx, min, max) = 1542 >> >> so we return 1542 and everything is fine. > > I don't believe so. > > #define clamp_t(type, val, lo, hi) \ > min_t(type, max_t(type, val, lo), hi) > > So: > min_t(u32, max_t(u32, 0, 1542), 0) I don't think so. If we have: new_tx = 0 max = 0 min = 1514(=datagram) + 8(=ndp) + 2(=1+1) * 4(=dpe) + 12(=nth) = 1542 max = max(min, max) = 1542 Then we have min_t(u32, max_t(u32, 0, 1542), 1542) If it wasn't clear - My proposal was to change this: - min = min(min, max); + max = max(min, max); in the original code. But looking further I don't think that's a good idea either. I searched through old email and found this commit: commit a6fe67087d7cb916e41b4ad1b3a57c91150edb88 Author: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri Nov 1 11:17:01 2013 +0100 net: cdc_ncm: no not set tx_max higher than the device supports There are MBIM devices out there reporting dwNtbInMaxSize=2048 dwNtbOutMaxSize=2048 and since the spec require a datagram max size of at least 2048, this means that a full sized datagram will never fit. Still, sending larger NTBs than the device supports is not going to help. We do not have any other options than either a) refusing to bindi, or b) respect the insanely low value. Alternative b will at least make these devices work, so go for it. Cc: Alexey Orishko <alexey.orishko@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c b/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c index 4531f38fc0e5..11c703337577 100644 --- a/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c +++ b/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c @@ -159,8 +159,7 @@ static u8 cdc_ncm_setup(struct usbnet *dev) } /* verify maximum size of transmitted NTB in bytes */ - if ((ctx->tx_max < (CDC_NCM_MIN_HDR_SIZE + ctx->max_datagram_size)) || - (ctx->tx_max > CDC_NCM_NTB_MAX_SIZE_TX)) { + if (ctx->tx_max > CDC_NCM_NTB_MAX_SIZE_TX) { dev_dbg(&dev->intf->dev, "Using default maximum transmit length=%d\n", CDC_NCM_NTB_MAX_SIZE_TX); ctx->tx_max = CDC_NCM_NTB_MAX_SIZE_TX; So there are real devices depending on a dwNtbOutMaxSize which is too low. Our calculated minimum for MBIM will not fit. So let's go back your original test for zero. It's better than nothing. I'll just ack that. > Perhaps we should use max_t() here instead of clamp? No. That would allow userspace to set an unlimited buffer size. Bjørn