On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, [iso-8859-2] Micha³ Nazarewicz wrote: > Removed code that was included when CONFIG_USB_FILE_STORAGE_TEST > was defined. If this functionality is required one may still use > the original File-backed Storage Gadget. It has been agreed that > testing functionality is not required in the composite function. > > Also, removed fsg_suspend() and fsg_resume() functions since > they were no operations. > +#define STORAGE_BUFLEN ((u32)16384) Evidently this is a matter of taste. To me, 16384u would look much better. > +eopnotsupp: > VSDBG(fsg, > - "unknown class-specific control req " > - "%02x.%02x v%04x i%04x l%u\n", > - ctrl->bRequestType, ctrl->bRequest, > - le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wValue), w_index, w_length); > + "unknown class-specific control req " > + "%02x.%02x v%04x i%04x l%u\n", > + ctrl->bRequestType, ctrl->bRequest, > + le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wValue), w_index, w_length); Why bother to change the indentation style? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
