[PATCH v3] USB: ehci_brcm_hub_control: improve port index sanitizing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Due to (wIndex & 0xff) - 1 can get an integer greater than 0xf, this
can cause array index to be out of bounds since the size of array
port_status is 0xf. Using macro function HCS_N_PORTS() can return
a valid index less than 15. Macro function HCS_N_PORTS() is used
to obtain a valid port index by logical AND 0xf.

Reported-by: TCS Robot <tcs_robot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Haimin Zhang <tcs.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-brcm.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-brcm.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-brcm.c
index d3626bfa966b..d2bf7768349c 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-brcm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-brcm.c
@@ -62,8 +62,11 @@ static int ehci_brcm_hub_control(
 	u32 __iomem	*status_reg;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int retval, irq_disabled = 0;
+	u32 temp;
 
-	status_reg = &ehci->regs->port_status[(wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
+	temp = (wIndex & 0xff) - 1;
+	temp = HCS_N_PORTS(temp);
+	status_reg = &ehci->regs->port_status[temp];
 
 	/*
 	 * RESUME is cleared when GetPortStatus() is called 20ms after start
-- 
2.30.1 (Apple Git-130)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux