On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:23:58AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > The USB gadget code is the only code that every tried to utilize the > 2nd argument of the aio completions, but there are strong suspicions > that it was never actually used by anything on the userspace side. > > Out of the 3 cases that touch it, two of them just pass in the same > as res, and the last one passes in error/transfer in res like any > other normal use case. > > Remove the 2nd argument, pass 0 like the rest of the in-kernel users > of kiocb based IO. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20211021174021.273c82b1.john@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Greg/John - if you guys are fine with this patch, let me know. I've got > the ->ki_complete() argument removal sitting on top of this. Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
