On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 28. August 2009 17:25:18 schrieb Greg KH: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:48:08AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > if I understand this correctly, no driver is using max_in_flight_urbs. > > > > Do we want to keep this feature or not? If we want to keep it, which > > > > drivers would sensibly use it? > > > > > > It is used in the debug-cable driver (usb_debug.c). Is that reason > > > enough to keep it? > > > > Yes, the goal was to move the other drivers to start using it as well, > > to remove the duplicated logic that they have for this type of thing. > > > > So I'd like to keep it, and start using it more often if possible. > > Good. But if this is to be done it better be done right. > So here's a version of it with interrupt mitigation. What > do you think? I'm confused, what do you mean by "interrupt mitigation" here? Overall, the patch looks to make things a lot cleaner, so I don't object to it, but just am wondering what it is trying to do. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
