Hello,
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 05:54:28AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:51:31AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:32:12PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
> > > index d997c9c3ebb5..7eb3706cf42d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
> > > @@ -20,38 +20,38 @@ static void pci_error_handlers(struct cxl_afu *afu,
> > > pci_channel_state_t state)
> > > {
> > > struct pci_dev *afu_dev;
> > > + struct pci_driver *afu_drv;
> > > + struct pci_error_handlers *err_handler;
> >
> > These two could be moved into the for loop (where afu_drv was with my
> > patch already). This is also possible in a few other drivers.
>
> That's true, they could. I tried to follow the prevailing style in
> the file. At least in cxl, I didn't see any other cases of
> declarations being in the minimal scope like that.
I don't care much, do whatever you consider nice. I'm happy you liked
the cleanup and that you took it.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
