Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_audio.c: Adding Playback Pitch ctl for sync playback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Dne 06. 10. 21 v 9:34 Greg KH napsal(a):
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 08:43:08AM +0200, Pavel Hofman wrote:

Dne 05. 10. 21 v 13:31 Greg KH napsal(a):
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Pavel Hofman wrote:
EP IN is hard-coded as ASYNC both in f_uac1 and f_uac2 but u_audio sends
steady number of audio frames in each USB packet, without any control.

This patch adds 'Playback Pitch 1000000' ctl analogous to the existing
'Capture Pitch 1000000' ctl. The calculation of playback req->length in
u_audio_iso_complete respects the Playback Pitch ctl value to 1ppm now.

Max. value for Playback Pitch is configured by the existing parameter
uac2_opts->fb_max, used also for the Capture Pitch.

Since the EP IN packet size can be increased by uac2_opts->fb_max now,
maxPacketSize for the playback direction is calculated by the same
algorithm as for the async capture direction in
f_uac2.c:set_ep_max_packet_size.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uac2.c  |  5 +-
   drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
   2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Does not apply to my tree, what kernel release / branch did you make
this against?


Greg, the patch requires patch 0560c9c ("usb: gadget: f_uac2: fixed EP-IN
wMaxPacketSize") which I sent prior to this one (not as a patch series, this
patch was not ready at that time). You applied 0560c9c to your usb-linus
yesterday, hence this patch applies cleanly to usb-linus now.

Your branch usb-next does not have 0560c9c yet, therefore the patch fails.
But both patches apply cleanly to usb-next as a series, tested just now.

This patch ("usb: gadget: u_audio.c: Adding Playback Pitch ctl for sync
playback") is not a bugfix and can wait in usb-next.

That goes back to my question of what are the rules for the two of your
branches. What if a new patch requires patches from both usb-linus (bugfix)
and usb-next (new features)?

I have 2 branches (well 3) in my tree:
	master - tracks Linus's tree
	usb-linus - patches to go to Linus for "this" release
	usb-next - patches to go to Linus for the "next" release


So bugfixes go into usb-linus, and new features go into usb-next.

After the patches in usb-linus get merged into Linus, I merge that
branch (well Linus's -rc release) into the usb-next branch so that
dependencies can get resolved and bugfixes show up for testing.

Greg, thanks for the explanation. Very useful.


or tell me and I will wait until that happens myself.

Is there a standardized way for that, e.g. somewhere in the PATCH mail message?

Thanks a lot,

Pavel.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux