Kevin Hilman wrote:
Add the function to register the OHCI platform device, given the root hub
related platform data passed from the board specific code.
While at it, modify USB 2.0 clock entry in order to match the clock by name
instead of by device since it is also needed by the OHCI glue layer...
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Oops, I did hit send too early -- my copy of the DaVinci tree appeared to be
not up-to-date! :-)
arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c | 2 -
arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h | 2 +
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-davinci/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c
===================================================================
--- linux-davinci.orig/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c
+++ linux-davinci/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static struct davinci_clk da830_clks[] =
CLK("davinci-mcasp.0", NULL, &mcasp0_clk),
CLK("davinci-mcasp.1", NULL, &mcasp1_clk),
CLK("davinci-mcasp.2", NULL, &mcasp2_clk),
- CLK("musb_hdrc", NULL, &usb20_clk),
+ CLK(NULL, "usb20", &usb20_clk),
I can live with it this way, but is there a reason you don't
want:
CLK("ohci, "usb20", &usb20_clk),
and add "ohci" to the usb11_clk as well?
I'm seeing no gain from it, only a drawback (of wasting some memory).
Kevin
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
