Re: [PATCH] usb: core: hcd: merge repetitive strings in usb_hcd_request_irqs()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26.08.2021 20:39, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
[...]
Two dev_info() calls in usb_hcd_request_irqs() have the same "io " strings
needlessly repeated. Merge these strings into the format strings of those
dev_info() calls...

Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>

---
The patch is against the 'usb-next' branch of Greg KH's 'usb.git' repo...

  drivers/usb/core/hcd.c |   12 ++++++------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: usb/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
===================================================================
--- usb.orig/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
+++ usb/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
@@ -2730,16 +2730,16 @@ static int usb_hcd_request_irqs(struct u
  			return retval;
  		}
  		hcd->irq = irqnum;
-		dev_info(hcd->self.controller, "irq %d, %s 0x%08llx\n", irqnum,
-				(hcd->driver->flags & HCD_MEMORY) ?
-					"io mem" : "io base",
-					(unsigned long long)hcd->rsrc_start);
+		dev_info(hcd->self.controller, "irq %d, io %s 0x%08llx\n",
+				irqnum, (hcd->driver->flags & HCD_MEMORY) ?
+					"mem" : "base",
+				(unsigned long long)hcd->rsrc_start);

This now makes it harder to grep for messages in the kernel source :(

    Mhm, maybe...

As this saves almost no memory, I'll just ignore this patch.

    I also didn't find the current strings adequate -- I'd understand "io mem" vs "io port",
not what it is now...

Indeed, HCD_MEMORY means MMIO, else means I/O ports. Would the patch fixing this substring be acceptable instead of this one?

thanks,

greg k-h

MBR, Sergey



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux