Hi Greg, On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 02:09:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:01:53PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Note, you are responding to an email from a very long time ago... Yeah, was sort of purpose :) (to try to retain the original context of the question of if the commits should be backported to stable series, which back then had no need raised) > > > > Due to the lack of response, I guess they don't need to go to any stable > > > kernel, so will queue them up for 5.11-rc1. > > > > At least one user in Debian (https://bugs.debian.org/992004) would be > > happy to have those backported as well to the 5.10.y series (which we > > will pick up). > > > > So if Benjamin ack's this, this would be great to have in 5.10.y. > > What are the git commit ids? Just ask for them to be applied to stable > like normal... Right, aplogies. The two commits were 47ea2929d58c35598e681212311d35b240c373ce and 217504a055325fe76ec1142aa15f14d3db77f94f. 47ea2929d58c ("usb: typec: ucsi: acpi: Always decode connector change information") 217504a05532 ("usb: typec: ucsi: Work around PPM losing change information") and in the followup Benjamin Berg mentioned to pick as well 8c9b3caab3ac26db1da00b8117901640c55a69dd 8c9b3caab3ac ("usb: typec: ucsi: Clear pending after acking connector change" a related fix later on. Regards, Salvatore
